Jump to content

Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    Welcome to the edit warring noticeboard
    Shortcuts
    Update this page

    This page is for reporting active edit warriors and recent violations of restrictions like the three-revert rule.

    You must notify any user you have reported.

    You may use {{subst:An3-notice}} ~~~~ to do so.

    You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

    Additional notes
    • When reporting a user here, your own behavior will also be scrutinized. Be sure you understand WP:REVERT and the definitions below first.
    • The format and contents of a 3RR/1RR report are important, use the "Click here to create a new report" button below to have a report template with the necessary fields to work from.
    • Possible alternatives to filing here are dispute resolution, or a request for page protection.
    • Violations of other restrictions, like WP:1RR violations, may also be brought here. Your report should include two reverts that occurred within a 24-hour period, and a link to where the 1RR restriction was imposed.
    Definition of edit warring
    Edit warring is a behavior, typically exemplified by the use of repeated edits to "win" a content dispute. It is different from a bold, revert, discuss (BRD) cycle. Reverting vandalism and banned users is not edit warring; at the same time, content disputes, even egregious point of view edits and other good-faith changes do not constitute vandalism. Administrators often must make a judgment call to identify edit warring when cooling disputes. Administrators currently use several measures to determine if a user is edit warring.
    Definition of the three-revert rule (3RR)
    An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Violations of this rule normally attract blocks of at least 24 hours. Any appearance of gaming the system by reverting a fourth time just outside the 24-hour slot is likely to be treated as a 3RR violation. See here for exemptions.

    Sections older than 48 hours are archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

    Click here to create a new report

    User:Widsither reported by User:Ermenrich (Result: Declined as mooted by user's apparent retirement)

    [edit]

    Page: Widsith (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
    User being reported: Widsither (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Previous version reverted to: [1]

    Diffs of the user's reverts:

    1. [2]
    2. [3]
    3. [4]
    4. [5]


    Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [6]

    Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [7]

    Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page: [diff]

    Comments:

    This user began as an IP and then registered an account. They have not made any effort to use the talk page or reacted to the edit warning label on their talk page.--Ermenrich (talk) 15:36, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    I have provided the article copyright-free sources for my edits. Many readers find Widsith poem mainly from wikipedia and it's now there provided copyright-free. You send me message five minutes before saying I havent made any effort to use the talk page or warning label. Please be patient before making accusations. Widsither (talk) 15:41, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    I'll note that Widsither now, having made whatever edits he wanted at Widsith without bothering to use the talk page to discuss them, has started some shenanigans about retiring [8]. They clearly have no real interest in collaborating on an encyclopedia, even beyond the edit warring so far.--Ermenrich (talk) 16:31, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    He hasn't edited since then. Let's see if he sticks to that. Daniel Case (talk) 20:37, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Declined It looks like he's meant it. Daniel Case (talk) 20:05, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:185.41.120.36 reported by User:Nswix (Result: Page protected for a month; CTOPS notice added to talk)

    [edit]

    Page: Bogdan Guskov (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

    User being reported: 185.41.120.36 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Previous version reverted to:

    Diffs of the user's reverts:

    1. 18:37, 10 February 2025 (UTC) "Russian origin plays a massive role for Bogdan Guskov himself, which he has repeatedly said in interviews, and for this reason he also taked a nickname "Czarevich", self-identifying as Russian by origin and specifically emphasizing this with his nickname. I will also remind you that Bogdan has Russian citizenship and in practice went out with the Russian flag in addition to the flag of Uzbekistan."
    2. 18:05, 10 February 2025 (UTC) "Undid revision 1275030123 by Nswix (talk) Yes, but this contradicts the practice in already protected pages in similar examples (see Nikolai Gogol, for example; there the question of origin is brought out in the first paragraph, and the page is extended confirmed protected)."
    3. 17:58, 10 February 2025 (UTC) "Undid revision 1274871028 by Nswix (talk) Bogdan Vladimirovich Guskov have a Russian origin from his mother and father-lines. No vandalism, please."

    Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

    1. 18:49, 10 February 2025 (UTC) "Caution: Unconstructive editing on Bogdan Guskov."

    Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

    Comments: Repeated reverts of MOS:ETHNICITY. User is also in an edit war at Old East Slavic. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nswix (talk • contribs)

    Page protected For a month. User didn't actually violate 3RR, but (largely because I forgot what noticeboard I was responding to), I felt protection the best option. Daniel Case (talk) 20:13, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:2600:6C4E:2F0:B950:3DA1:638:9B46:812B reported by User:Lone-078 (Result: Declined – malformed report)

    [edit]

    Page: Sneferu (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

    User being reported: 2600:6C4E:2F0:B950:3DA1:638:9B46:812B (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Previous version reverted to:

    Diffs of the user's reverts:


    Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:


    Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:


    Comments:

    Persistent addition of unsourced birth/death dates on several articles about ancient people, also with other IPs such as 2600:6c4e:02f0:b950:883e:b3ff:fec3:9b93 , 2600:6c4e:2f0:b950:3cb5:a1ff:fe64:fd2b , and also 64.113.165.126. Doesn't answer in their talk page. Already reported and blocked on 15 January. I would suggest a rangeblock on the 2600:6c4e:2f0:b950::/64 range. Lone-078 (talk) 16:40, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Yashraghuwanshi00 reported by User:Ratnahastin (Result: Indefinitely blocked)

    [edit]

    Page: Raghuvaṃśa (dynasty) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

    User being reported: Yashraghuwanshi00 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Previous version reverted to:

    Diffs of the user's reverts:

    1. 12:46, 13 February 2025 (UTC) "reverted changes"
    2. 12:16, 13 February 2025 (UTC) "some factual changes"
    3. 12:01, 13 February 2025 (UTC) "reverted changes"
    4. 04:37, 13 February 2025 (UTC) "reverted changes by unknown"
    5. 18:19, 12 February 2025 (UTC) "some factual changes"
    6. 17:14, 12 February 2025 (UTC) "some factual changes"
    7. 17:09, 12 February 2025 (UTC) "some factual changes"

    Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

    1. 12:28, 13 February 2025 (UTC) "Warning: Edit warring on Raghuvaṃśa (dynasty)."

    Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:


    Comments:

    Constant caste based POV blanking of sourced content, despite being aware of GSCASTE and edit warring warning. Also continuing to edit war on Baliyan (surname) [9] - Ratnahastin (talk) 13:03, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Aganon77 reported by User:MrOllie (Result: Blocked one week)

    [edit]

    Page: Ganzfeld experiment (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

    User being reported: Aganon77 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Previous version reverted to:

    Diffs of the user's reverts:

    1. 14:35, 13 February 2025 (UTC) "MrOllie is avoiding to engage in the content, even updating context of existing references"
    2. 14:17, 13 February 2025 (UTC) "Added image for updated metaanalysis"
    3. 19:07, 12 February 2025 (UTC) "I DID USE THE TALK ARTICLE; TALK. DO NOT UNDO; Undid revision 1275386462 by LuckyLouie (talk)"
    4. 18:42, 12 February 2025 (UTC) "/* Contemporary research */"

    A couple days old but relevant

    1. 21:22, 10 February 2025 (UTC) "Cited metaanalysis to stop unfair edits"
    2. 21:17, 10 February 2025 (UTC) "Undid revision 1275057658 by Hemiauchenia (talk)"
    3. 18:11, 10 February 2025 (UTC) "Undid revision 1275031750 by LuckyLouie (talk)"

    Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

    1. 14:24, 13 February 2025 (UTC) "/* February 2025 */"

    Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

    1. 14:38, 13 February 2025 (UTC) "/* Questionable conducts by editors regarding reputable sources */ Reply"

    Comments:

    Profringe edit warring about ESP. Everyone else who has commented on the talk page is against. There's also this from an IP, pretty clearly the same person. - MrOllie (talk) 14:41, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Just saw that Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Request_concerning_Aganon77 was opened as I was typing up this one. - MrOllie (talk) 14:46, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring&oldid=1275550504"